Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.K. Lund's avatar

Jon, nice work here. I am all for trialing Basic Income programs to evaluate their effects on crime and poverty, but I hesitate to support this program for three reasons.

1) “the program is aimed at enrolling residents of Chicago with a history of economic difficulty.”

If the program is not universal, it is going to breed resentment. Full stop. There is no reasonable means of determining who is disadvantaged from who is not.

2) What is the funding source?

Here the funding is leftover stimulus money. Ultimately, it will be paid via taxpayers’ income tax. Essentially, taking money from one person’s pocket and putting it in another. I don’t support this. UBI should be funded out of social wealth, like Land Values or Distributed Profits, wealth that is collectively created, not individual labor.

See my essay on LVT: https://www.lianeon.org/p/just-tax-the-land

3) Basic Income programs should replace existing welfare programs.

The benefits to the poor already provided are broad. SNAP/WIC, Medicaid, housing assistance, Pell Grants…etc. Basic income is intended to be more effective than these programs, but it only can if it replaces them.

Expand full comment

No posts